Pages

Thursday, September 27, 2012

Juno Review Readers Response


Ali Heinkamp’s review over the Juno was very good! I was really surprised that she was from Wright State University. I do not know why I was so surprised that a person who wrote this would be so close.  When I read that she was a student at Wright State College I was struck by the familiarity of it.
Ali Heinkamp’s review will be extremely helpful for me when I write mine. It was laid out perfectly and showed where everything was supposed to go. Her thesis is easy to pick out which makes it easy for her readers to understand what the movie is about. She points out the pros and cons of the movie by displaying how its been criticized by other people.  She says that Juno’s character’s situations that they find themselves in and the dialogue may be criticized as unrealistic. This then allows her readers to understand that these two bad criticisms of her review are going be part of her body. She also writes within her thesis that the movies effectively represents a teenagers emotion if they were put into a situation like that that shoved them into maturity too quickly. Not only is this another part of her body that she explains, but it is also a counter acting criticism to the first two she displayed. Ali Heinkamp shows that your paper should also include direct quotes from criticisms found in her research. Overall I found that this was very well written and will help me very much when writing my own.

No comments:

Post a Comment